FN M86 1936 Armored Motorcycle w/ Vickers Machine Gun. Right Photo Caras y Caretas 1930s. Left Photo computarized image (AI) .
The FN M86 (specifically the 600cc variant) was a powerhouse of Belgian engineering that found a unique niche in the Argentine Army during the late 1930s. While standard military motorcycles were common, Argentina acquired a specialized sidecar combination variant of the FN M86 in 1936.
Armament: The sidecar was fitted with a Vickers Class C/T machine gun, specifically chambered in the Argentine standard 7.65×53 mm caliber.
"Armored" Designation: Unlike typical motorcycles, these units featured protective steel shields for both the driver and the sidecar gunner to provide cover against small arms fire while engaging the enemy.
Engine & Power: The 600cc OHV (Overhead Valve) engine was chosen for its high torque, necessary to handle the additional weight of the sidecar, armor plating, and heavy Vickers gun.
Service History
These were utilized by Cavalry Reconnaissance units for high-speed scouting and screening missions. They provided significantly more firepower than a standard infantry patrol while maintaining the mobility of a motorcycle.
They served alongside the Vickers Modelo Argentino 1938 light tanks during the late 1930s and through the 1940s.
This "armored sidecar" configuration was a specialized order; while the Belgian Army used limited numbers, Argentina was one of the few international customers to deploy them in this specific "combat-ready" setup.
Technical Specs (FN M86 Military)
Engine: 598cc single-cylinder OHV.
Top Speed: Approximately 130 km/h (solo), though significantly reduced with the armored sidecar.
Gun: Vickers Class C/T, water-cooled or air-cooled variants were tested, but the tank-type Class C/T was the standard for vehicle mounts.
The FN M86 (specifically the 600cc variant) was a powerhouse of Belgian engineering that found a unique niche in the Argentine Army during the late 1930s. While standard military motorcycles were common, Argentina acquired a specialized sidecar combination variant of the FN M86 in 1936.
Armament: The sidecar was fitted with a Vickers Class C/T machine gun, specifically chambered in the Argentine standard 7.65×53 mm caliber.
"Armored" Designation: Unlike typical motorcycles, these units featured protective steel shields for both the driver and the sidecar gunner to provide cover against small arms fire while engaging the enemy.
Engine & Power: The 600cc OHV (Overhead Valve) engine was chosen for its high torque, necessary to handle the additional weight of the sidecar, armor plating, and heavy Vickers gun.
Service History
These were utilized by Cavalry Reconnaissance units for high-speed scouting and screening missions. They provided significantly more firepower than a standard infantry patrol while maintaining the mobility of a motorcycle.
They served alongside the Vickers Modelo Argentino 1938 light tanks during the late 1930s and through the 1940s.
This "armored sidecar" configuration was a specialized order; while the Belgian Army used limited numbers, Argentina was one of the few international customers to deploy them in this specific "combat-ready" setup.
Technical Specs (FN M86 Military)
Engine: 598cc single-cylinder OHV.
Top Speed: Approximately 130 km/h (solo), though significantly reduced with the armored sidecar.
Gun: Vickers Class C/T, water-cooled or air-cooled variants were tested, but the tank-type Class C/T was the standard for vehicle mounts.
Crossley Armored Car Model 1926
The Argentine Army acquired six Vickers-Crossley Model 26 (Indian Pattern) armoured cars in 1928.
These were derived from the British Indian Army cars, but with two axles instead of three. The Crossley armoured cars in India were designed and used specifically for colonial policing and frontier security. Often called the "Indian Pattern" or Vickers-Crossley M25, they were the primary tools for maintaining British control in volatile regions.
Armament: A hemispherical turret equipped with twin 7.7 mm water-cooled Vickers machine guns and a domed cupola.
Protection: The vehicle utilized 6 mm thick riveted and welded armor.
Performance: Powered by a 50 hp 4-cylinder gasoline engine, it reached top speeds of 65 to 70 km/h.
Service History
Regiment of Mounted Grenadiers: They were initially assigned to this elite unit.
1930 Coup d'état: The vehicles saw their most significant combat action during the 1930 Argentine coup that overthrew President Hipólito Yrigoyen. They saw some actions here.
Federal Police: Following their army service, some units were transferred to the Argentine Federal Police for internal security duties.
In Estonia service
Estonian ordered components from Britain (chassis and engine) and Sweden (armour plates) and assembled them locally in the Arsenal factory in Tallinn. A total of 13 vehicles were produced between 1926 and 1928, entering service in 1926.
Engine. British-made Crossley Motors Ltd engine.
Armament. Seven cars were fitted with 7.7 mm Madsen machine guns, while six others had a 37 mm Hotchkiss or Puteaux cannon.
These were derived from the British Indian Army cars, but with two axles instead of three. The Crossley armoured cars in India were designed and used specifically for colonial policing and frontier security. Often called the "Indian Pattern" or Vickers-Crossley M25, they were the primary tools for maintaining British control in volatile regions.
Armament: A hemispherical turret equipped with twin 7.7 mm water-cooled Vickers machine guns and a domed cupola.
Protection: The vehicle utilized 6 mm thick riveted and welded armor.
Performance: Powered by a 50 hp 4-cylinder gasoline engine, it reached top speeds of 65 to 70 km/h.
Service History
Regiment of Mounted Grenadiers: They were initially assigned to this elite unit.
1930 Coup d'état: The vehicles saw their most significant combat action during the 1930 Argentine coup that overthrew President Hipólito Yrigoyen. They saw some actions here.
Federal Police: Following their army service, some units were transferred to the Argentine Federal Police for internal security duties.
In Estonia service
Estonian ordered components from Britain (chassis and engine) and Sweden (armour plates) and assembled them locally in the Arsenal factory in Tallinn. A total of 13 vehicles were produced between 1926 and 1928, entering service in 1926.
Engine. British-made Crossley Motors Ltd engine.
Armament. Seven cars were fitted with 7.7 mm Madsen machine guns, while six others had a 37 mm Hotchkiss or Puteaux cannon.
On the left is a French prototype with Hotchkiss machine gun. The British and French were the first to apply the concept of the armored car, that is put moderate armor on an all-terrain automobile and add a machine gun and swivelling tower. (Maxim for the British, Hotchkiss for the French).
These old trucks had hard, rubber-covered metal tires. On the right is an interesting advertisement for these tires by Goodrich (sold by Henry W. Peabody and Cia at Cangallo 1660 Buenos Aires, Argentina).
The 1930 Argentine coup d'état, also known as the September Revolution
Caras y Caretas 1930.
The 1930 Argentine coup d'état, also known as the September Revolution, took place on September 6, 1930. It was a pivotal event that overthrew the democratically elected president Hipólito Yrigoyen and initiated the "Infamous Decade" of military influence and electoral fraud.
The six Vickers-Crossley Model 1926 armored cars, which Argentina had received in 1928, saw their most significant combat use during this coup. Operated by the Regiment of Mounted Grenadiers, these vehicles were used to secure key locations in Buenos Aires. Their presence provided mobile fire support and psychological intimidation as General José Félix Uriburu led troops into the capital to take control of the Casa Rosada.
The 1930 Argentine coup d'état, also known as the September Revolution, took place on September 6, 1930. It was a pivotal event that overthrew the democratically elected president Hipólito Yrigoyen and initiated the "Infamous Decade" of military influence and electoral fraud.
The six Vickers-Crossley Model 1926 armored cars, which Argentina had received in 1928, saw their most significant combat use during this coup. Operated by the Regiment of Mounted Grenadiers, these vehicles were used to secure key locations in Buenos Aires. Their presence provided mobile fire support and psychological intimidation as General José Félix Uriburu led troops into the capital to take control of the Casa Rosada.
General José Félix Uriburu, who aimed to establish a nationalist, corporatist regime. The coup was triggered by the economic collapse of the Great Depression and growing political opposition to Yrigoyen's second term.
The Argentine Constitution was suspended, and a military dictatorship was established. This marked the first time the Argentine military disrupted the constitutional order, setting a precedent for decades of political instability.
Despite the significant political shift, the coup itself met with very little opposition in the capital and resulted in no reported casualties during the takeover.
The 1930 coup was the spark that ignited the "Infamous Decade" (Década Infame), a dark period of Argentine history that lasted until 1943.
The era was plagued by massive scandals involving bribery and government-linked monopolies.The ruling conservatives openly used ballot-stuffing and voter intimidation, arguing it was "patriotic" to keep the country out of the hands of the "radical rabble".
The Great Depression hit Argentina hard, forcing a massive rural exodus that created the first major villas miseria (shanty towns) around Buenos Aires.
The Crossley armored cars you were were effectively the "muscle" used to keep this unpopular system in power during those years. The era only ended when another coup in 1943 which included a young Juan Perón overthrew the government.
The Argentine Constitution was suspended, and a military dictatorship was established. This marked the first time the Argentine military disrupted the constitutional order, setting a precedent for decades of political instability.
Despite the significant political shift, the coup itself met with very little opposition in the capital and resulted in no reported casualties during the takeover.
The 1930 coup was the spark that ignited the "Infamous Decade" (Década Infame), a dark period of Argentine history that lasted until 1943.
The era was plagued by massive scandals involving bribery and government-linked monopolies.The ruling conservatives openly used ballot-stuffing and voter intimidation, arguing it was "patriotic" to keep the country out of the hands of the "radical rabble".
The Great Depression hit Argentina hard, forcing a massive rural exodus that created the first major villas miseria (shanty towns) around Buenos Aires.
The Crossley armored cars you were were effectively the "muscle" used to keep this unpopular system in power during those years. The era only ended when another coup in 1943 which included a young Juan Perón overthrew the government.
While Perón was a lower-ranking officer compared to the leaders,here the famous historical photographs showing him alongside General José Félix Uriburu during the events of September 1930. Yes, a young Army Captain Juan Perón, future president of Argentina, participated in the coup as a supporter of Uriburu.
A well-known anecdote from Perón's years in exile. When critics or journalists tried to paint Ernesto "Che" Guevara as a strictly "anti-Peronist" figure (often citing Che's early links to anti-government groups 1946-55), Perón would dismantle the argument by highlighting how much people change as they mature.
Perón would ask, "How old was Che Guevara in 1955?". In 1955, the year Perón was overthrown, Che was only 27 and still developing his radical ideology. Perón’s point was that a young man's early political associations like Che’s supposed links to a 1951 coup attempt shouldn't define his entire legacy. He would then bridge this to his own life, admitting that he was also a young captain participating in a coup in 1930. By 1955, Perón viewed himself as a mature statesman and saw the irony in being judged by his actions as a 34-year-old soldier.
That historical irony is one of the most striking contradictions in Argentine politics. In the 1946 election, the anti-Peronist coalition the Democratic Union (Unión Democrática) was a "strange bedfellows" alliance that placed the communist and socialist Left on the same side as the U.S. State Department and the traditional oligarchy.
The 1946 campaign was defined by the slogan "Braden or Perón". Spruille Braden, the U.S. Ambassador, actively campaigned against Perón, even releasing the "Blue Book on Argentina" to link Perón to Nazi-fascism.
Because the Soviet Union and the international Left viewed Perón as a "Nazi-fascist" threat during WWII, the Communist Party and Socialist Party joined the Democratic Union.
A well-known anecdote from Perón's years in exile. When critics or journalists tried to paint Ernesto "Che" Guevara as a strictly "anti-Peronist" figure (often citing Che's early links to anti-government groups 1946-55), Perón would dismantle the argument by highlighting how much people change as they mature.
Perón would ask, "How old was Che Guevara in 1955?". In 1955, the year Perón was overthrown, Che was only 27 and still developing his radical ideology. Perón’s point was that a young man's early political associations like Che’s supposed links to a 1951 coup attempt shouldn't define his entire legacy. He would then bridge this to his own life, admitting that he was also a young captain participating in a coup in 1930. By 1955, Perón viewed himself as a mature statesman and saw the irony in being judged by his actions as a 34-year-old soldier.
That historical irony is one of the most striking contradictions in Argentine politics. In the 1946 election, the anti-Peronist coalition the Democratic Union (Unión Democrática) was a "strange bedfellows" alliance that placed the communist and socialist Left on the same side as the U.S. State Department and the traditional oligarchy.
The 1946 campaign was defined by the slogan "Braden or Perón". Spruille Braden, the U.S. Ambassador, actively campaigned against Perón, even releasing the "Blue Book on Argentina" to link Perón to Nazi-fascism.
Because the Soviet Union and the international Left viewed Perón as a "Nazi-fascist" threat during WWII, the Communist Party and Socialist Party joined the Democratic Union.
First Tanks
The first actual tank in Argentina was a single Renault FT light tank acquired from France in 1924.
It was used strictly for testing and evaluation at the Infantry School in Campo de Mayo.
The Army liked the concept but didn't have the budget to buy a full fleet at the time, so it remained a lone "technological demonstrator."
The Semi-Tank: Fiat 3000 (1920s)
Argentina also evaluated the Italian Fiat 3000 during the same period, but like the Renault, it was never integrated into a formal armored division.
It was used strictly for testing and evaluation at the Infantry School in Campo de Mayo.
The Army liked the concept but didn't have the budget to buy a full fleet at the time, so it remained a lone "technological demonstrator."
The Semi-Tank: Fiat 3000 (1920s)
Argentina also evaluated the Italian Fiat 3000 during the same period, but like the Renault, it was never integrated into a formal armored division.
A little known event is when, for the holiday of the 25th of May in 1924, an Italian tank "Carro armato" paraded. It was a Fiat 3000 M21 (4-cyl Fiat engine). This light tank was an Italian version of the Renault FT-17 armed with a 1x 37mm or 2x 6.5mm Fiat or SIA machine guns. This armored fighting vehicle (AVF) was already surpassed at the moment it came out of production and had a very short career in service. It was replaced by new generations of armored vehicles developed by the Ansaldo Armament of Genoa like the "Carro Veloce" CV.33 or L3/33 which, along with the CV.35 or L3/35, were nicknamed "scatole di sardine" or sardine cans.
There is no data to indicate if this tank arrived in Argentina as part of a marketing campaign to sell it or only to participate in the parade for Memorial Day. Not long after this (1930) Argentina purchased the British Vickers so there may have been an interest in buying tanks beforehand and Italy was showing off its merchandise. Millions of Italian citizens were consantly arriving in the Argentine Republic as immigrants in those days. The tank was seen with the flag of the Regio Esercito Italiano with the shield of Savoy on one side and an Argentine flag on the other. The tank was painted in the camo colors that the British described in the desert as spinach and sand.
There is no data to indicate if this tank arrived in Argentina as part of a marketing campaign to sell it or only to participate in the parade for Memorial Day. Not long after this (1930) Argentina purchased the British Vickers so there may have been an interest in buying tanks beforehand and Italy was showing off its merchandise. Millions of Italian citizens were consantly arriving in the Argentine Republic as immigrants in those days. The tank was seen with the flag of the Regio Esercito Italiano with the shield of Savoy on one side and an Argentine flag on the other. The tank was painted in the camo colors that the British described in the desert as spinach and sand.
This tank was used in counter-insurgency actions against the rebel tribes in Libya and in the service of the AOI (Africa Orientale Italiana). Later it was used in the Slovak-Hungarian War, among other operations.
According to the website Tanks (Armoured Warfare prior to 1946), Argentina was with Czechoslovakia in advanced conversations to incorporate CKD (Ceskomoravska Kolben Danek) 38(T) tanks, known as Panzer 38(T), from the TNHP exportation series, but when WWII broke out it halted the deal. This tank became famous in German hands during the war. When it became dated due to new technology, it served for reconnaissance. The chassis was also used as a basis for anti-aircraft guns, a weapons carrier and the Hetzer tank destroyer.
These tanks had a Skoda 37mm cannon (3.7mm KwK 38(T) L/47.8) and two 7.92mm ZB53 (MG 37t) machine guns (the British made a version of this machinegun called the Besa 7.92mm made by the Birmingham Small Arms Company to mount on their tanks and vehicles).
According to the website Tanks (Armoured Warfare prior to 1946), Argentina was with Czechoslovakia in advanced conversations to incorporate CKD (Ceskomoravska Kolben Danek) 38(T) tanks, known as Panzer 38(T), from the TNHP exportation series, but when WWII broke out it halted the deal. This tank became famous in German hands during the war. When it became dated due to new technology, it served for reconnaissance. The chassis was also used as a basis for anti-aircraft guns, a weapons carrier and the Hetzer tank destroyer.
These tanks had a Skoda 37mm cannon (3.7mm KwK 38(T) L/47.8) and two 7.92mm ZB53 (MG 37t) machine guns (the British made a version of this machinegun called the Besa 7.92mm made by the Birmingham Small Arms Company to mount on their tanks and vehicles).
Vickers 1934 (M38 Arg). Note the Horstmann Suspension System.
The Vickers light tanks model 1934, M38 Arg . The photo is declassified from the Associated Press. The light armored Vickers incorporated in the decade of the 30s were dependent on the Comando de Arsenales. The crews of these vehicles used the reglamentary combat uniform, including the German type M36 parade helmet and pith helmet. Towards 1940 leather clothing appeared in the mountain troop style for motorized drivers.
In 1937, during the presidency of Agustín P. Justo, Argentina purchased
12 Vickers-Carden-Loyd Model 1934 light tanks from the United Kingdom to modernize its military forces. These vehicles, often referred to in local manuals as the Vickers Modelo Argentino 1938, were the country's first truly modern tracked armored vehicles.
Armament: A single 7.71 mm Vickers .303 machine gun (Class C/T) housed in a cylindrical turret.
Protection: Lightly armored with riveted steel plates ranging from 4 mm to 9 mm in thickness, designed primarily to resist small arms fire.
Mobility: Powered by a 90 HP Meadows petrol engine, reaching speeds up to 64 km/h on roads.
Crew: Two men (Commander/Gunner and Driver).
In 1937, during the presidency of Agustín P. Justo, Argentina purchased
12 Vickers-Carden-Loyd Model 1934 light tanks from the United Kingdom to modernize its military forces. These vehicles, often referred to in local manuals as the Vickers Modelo Argentino 1938, were the country's first truly modern tracked armored vehicles.
Armament: A single 7.71 mm Vickers .303 machine gun (Class C/T) housed in a cylindrical turret.
Protection: Lightly armored with riveted steel plates ranging from 4 mm to 9 mm in thickness, designed primarily to resist small arms fire.
Mobility: Powered by a 90 HP Meadows petrol engine, reaching speeds up to 64 km/h on roads.
Crew: Two men (Commander/Gunner and Driver).
Operational History
The tanks arrived in two batches in mid-1938 aboard the merchant ship Avelona Star. They were initially part of the Compañía de Tanques Livianos (Light Tank Company) and later integrated into the Batallón de Tanques in 1948.
Their primary role was to train crews and establish tank doctrine while awaiting heavier vehicles. They performed well in maneuvers near the Uruguayan border in 1938.
Service during Perón’s Era: By the mid-1940s, they were considered obsolete. Some were transferred to the 2nd Infantry Regiment communications section, while others were reportedly used by the Federal Police.
Retirement and Legacy: The Vickers light tanks were phased out starting in 1948 as Argentina began receiving large surpluses of M4 Shermans and Crusader Gun Tractors from Europe. By 1952, they were completely removed from official inventories and most were likely scrapped. One legend suggests a single unit survived as a children's playground attraction.
The tanks arrived in two batches in mid-1938 aboard the merchant ship Avelona Star. They were initially part of the Compañía de Tanques Livianos (Light Tank Company) and later integrated into the Batallón de Tanques in 1948.
Their primary role was to train crews and establish tank doctrine while awaiting heavier vehicles. They performed well in maneuvers near the Uruguayan border in 1938.
Service during Perón’s Era: By the mid-1940s, they were considered obsolete. Some were transferred to the 2nd Infantry Regiment communications section, while others were reportedly used by the Federal Police.
Retirement and Legacy: The Vickers light tanks were phased out starting in 1948 as Argentina began receiving large surpluses of M4 Shermans and Crusader Gun Tractors from Europe. By 1952, they were completely removed from official inventories and most were likely scrapped. One legend suggests a single unit survived as a children's playground attraction.
Tank Vickers : the photo say : " Regimiento 2 de infanteria seccion communicaciones" 1943. Collection FP France. Courtesy of Historian Frédéric Pineau.
Caras y Caretas 1938-39
The Tank Argentina Wanted
Argentina never actually operated the Panzer 38(t) or the LT vz. 38. However, the tank is a critical "what-if" in Argentine history because it was the military's top choice before they were forced to build their own tanks.
In the late 1930s, the Argentine Army identified the Czechoslovakian LT vz. 38 as the ideal vehicle for their modernization.
Seeing their neighbor Peru successfully purchase a customized version (the LTP), Argentina planned to order a significant number of these tanks.
The 1938 Munich Agreement and the subsequent German occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1939 halted all potential exports to Argentina.
The tanks intended for export were instead seized and integrated into the Wehrmacht as the Panzer 38(t).
The Result: The Nahuel DL-43
Because Argentina could not buy the Panzer 38(t) or modern tanks from the U.S. (due to their neutrality and later diplomatic tensions), they decided to build an indigenous alternative.
This led to the creation of the Nahuel DL-43, Argentina's first domestic medium tank, which drew inspiration from modern designs of the era but used locally available components like German-made Krupp howitzers.
Regional Comparison: Peru vs. Argentina
While Argentina missed out, Peru became the only South American nation to successfully operate the vz. 38 family.
Peru's LTPs: Peru bought 24 units in 1938. They used them successfully in the 1841 Ecuadorian–Peruvian War, where the tanks' reliability and mobility in difficult terrain proved decisive.
Longevity: Some of Peru's Czechoslovakian tanks remained in service for over 30 years.
In the late 1930s, the Argentine Army identified the Czechoslovakian LT vz. 38 as the ideal vehicle for their modernization.
Seeing their neighbor Peru successfully purchase a customized version (the LTP), Argentina planned to order a significant number of these tanks.
The 1938 Munich Agreement and the subsequent German occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1939 halted all potential exports to Argentina.
The tanks intended for export were instead seized and integrated into the Wehrmacht as the Panzer 38(t).
The Result: The Nahuel DL-43
Because Argentina could not buy the Panzer 38(t) or modern tanks from the U.S. (due to their neutrality and later diplomatic tensions), they decided to build an indigenous alternative.
This led to the creation of the Nahuel DL-43, Argentina's first domestic medium tank, which drew inspiration from modern designs of the era but used locally available components like German-made Krupp howitzers.
Regional Comparison: Peru vs. Argentina
While Argentina missed out, Peru became the only South American nation to successfully operate the vz. 38 family.
Peru's LTPs: Peru bought 24 units in 1938. They used them successfully in the 1841 Ecuadorian–Peruvian War, where the tanks' reliability and mobility in difficult terrain proved decisive.
Longevity: Some of Peru's Czechoslovakian tanks remained in service for over 30 years.
One of the 50 Czechoslovakian tank Panzer 38(t) (Lt Vz.38) model TNHP acquired from Iran. This tank is conserved near a military museum in Tehran. Next to that yo see the unmistakable figure of a Sherman M4-type tank. The above photo is from Panoramio.com.
DL 43 Nahuel (Tiger)
Left: Colonel Peron, (Minister of War). Center: Lieutnant Colonel Alfredo Aquiles Baisi. Right: Counter Admiral Alberto Tessaire. Many thanks to Georg Rauch for sharing his knowledge with us!
DL43 Nahuel. Armamant: Krupp Model 1909 75/30 mm. 1 x 13mm coaxial MG and three 8mm MG. Like the M4, the 'Nahuel' was armed with a 75mm main gun, and there was a co-axially mounted 12.7mm, and
three hull-mounted 7,65mm machine guns. Engine: FMA-Lorraine Dietrich 12 EB, 12 cylinders in W, 500 Hp, water cooled. Weight: 35,000 Kg. Crew: 5.
three hull-mounted 7,65mm machine guns. Engine: FMA-Lorraine Dietrich 12 EB, 12 cylinders in W, 500 Hp, water cooled. Weight: 35,000 Kg. Crew: 5.
The Nahuel (Tiger), was designed as an infantry support tank. Computarized image of the chassis. Note the Bogie with Vertical Volute Spring Suspension (VVSS) and overhead roller as the M3 Lee, M7 Priest.
Early VVSS M3 Lee/Grant type bogies with overhead roller guide. This suspension system was also found on the early M4 Sherman Tanks.
While Argentina was manufacturing its own indigenous Nahuel DL-43 (1943–1944), China
did not produce any domestic tanks. Instead, the Chinese armored forces were a diverse collection of imported and captured vehicles from across the globe.
China's Inventory (1943–1944)
During this period, the Nationalist Revolutionary Army (NRA) was receiving significant aid from the Allies to fight the Japanese. Their fleet consisted of:
American Lend-Lease (The Modern Force):
4A4 Sherman: Approximately 35 units were acquired between 1943 and 1944, making them contemporaries of the Nahuel.
M3A3 and M5A1 Stuart: Around 48 of these light tanks were received via Lend-Lease in 1943.
M2A4 Light Tank: Roughly 233 units were acquired to bolster their forces.
Soviet Imports (The 1930s Survivors):
T-26 (Mod. 1933): China had purchased 82–88 of these light tanks from the USSR in 1938. While aging by 1943, they remained a core part of the 200th Mechanized Division.
Axis and European Imports (Pre-War Stock):
Panzer I Ausf. A: A small number (approx. 10–15) were purchased from Germany in 1936.
CV-33/35 Tankettes: Roughly 20 Italian tankettes were still in service.
Vickers 6-ton & Carden Loyd: Various British light tanks and carriers from the early 1930s.
Captured Japanese Armor:
Type 97 Chi-Ha: Nationalist and Communist forces frequently operated captured Japanese medium and light tanks marked with Chinese flags.
It is a striking historical contrast. In the mid-1940s,Argentina was an emerging industrial powerhouse capable of designing a 35-ton medium tank, while China was a fragmented, war-torn nation dependent on imports. The divergence between the two nations is defined by their very different paths over the last 80 years. The primary difference is that Argentina's Nahuel was an attempt at industrial sovereignty, while China's "tank school" was almost entirely dependent on international aid and capture. China would not begin its own domestic tank production until 1957, with the Soviet-assisted Type 59.
In 1943, Argentina was one of the wealthiest nations in the world, thriving on agricultural exports and a rapidly growing industrial sector. The Nahuel DL-43 was the ultimate symbol of this era—a bold statement that Argentina didn't need the US or Europe to defend itself.
After WWII, Argentina chose to buy cheap, mass-produced Allied surplus (like Shermans) rather than invest in the expensive, slow-moving process of indigenous serial production. This "short-term savings" approach contributed to the eventual stagnation of its domestic heavy industry.
did not produce any domestic tanks. Instead, the Chinese armored forces were a diverse collection of imported and captured vehicles from across the globe.
China's Inventory (1943–1944)
During this period, the Nationalist Revolutionary Army (NRA) was receiving significant aid from the Allies to fight the Japanese. Their fleet consisted of:
American Lend-Lease (The Modern Force):
4A4 Sherman: Approximately 35 units were acquired between 1943 and 1944, making them contemporaries of the Nahuel.
M3A3 and M5A1 Stuart: Around 48 of these light tanks were received via Lend-Lease in 1943.
M2A4 Light Tank: Roughly 233 units were acquired to bolster their forces.
Soviet Imports (The 1930s Survivors):
T-26 (Mod. 1933): China had purchased 82–88 of these light tanks from the USSR in 1938. While aging by 1943, they remained a core part of the 200th Mechanized Division.
Axis and European Imports (Pre-War Stock):
Panzer I Ausf. A: A small number (approx. 10–15) were purchased from Germany in 1936.
CV-33/35 Tankettes: Roughly 20 Italian tankettes were still in service.
Vickers 6-ton & Carden Loyd: Various British light tanks and carriers from the early 1930s.
Captured Japanese Armor:
Type 97 Chi-Ha: Nationalist and Communist forces frequently operated captured Japanese medium and light tanks marked with Chinese flags.
It is a striking historical contrast. In the mid-1940s,Argentina was an emerging industrial powerhouse capable of designing a 35-ton medium tank, while China was a fragmented, war-torn nation dependent on imports. The divergence between the two nations is defined by their very different paths over the last 80 years. The primary difference is that Argentina's Nahuel was an attempt at industrial sovereignty, while China's "tank school" was almost entirely dependent on international aid and capture. China would not begin its own domestic tank production until 1957, with the Soviet-assisted Type 59.
In 1943, Argentina was one of the wealthiest nations in the world, thriving on agricultural exports and a rapidly growing industrial sector. The Nahuel DL-43 was the ultimate symbol of this era—a bold statement that Argentina didn't need the US or Europe to defend itself.
After WWII, Argentina chose to buy cheap, mass-produced Allied surplus (like Shermans) rather than invest in the expensive, slow-moving process of indigenous serial production. This "short-term savings" approach contributed to the eventual stagnation of its domestic heavy industry.
 |
 |
Photos from a parade on July 9, 1944 celebrating the 128th anniversary of the country's independence. Several units from different regions of the country participated. Novelties that awoke a great interest were the Nahuel tank, parachutists, skiers, cyclists, planes, Andinean troops and the mechanized troops. The 2 photos above show the profile of the famous Argentine tank DL43 Nahuel (Puma in the local indiginous language). The tank had a picture of a puma on each side of the body. The Nahuel was a completely Argentine design. Unfortunately there are no tanks left. Originally the radio equipment could have been a local copy of the Telefunken, possibily a TRD or a 5W with a Type A receptor. Later it could have been exchanged for a WS-19 Wireless Set to strengthen it.
The Nahuel DL-43 was Argentina's indigenous medium tank developed during World War II when international embargos prevented the purchase of modern armor. It is most frequently compared to the M4 Sherman, though it incorporated design elements that made it superior in some specific technical areas.
Direct Comparisons to Major WWII Tanks
M4 Sherman (United States): The Nahuel is often called the "Argentine Sherman" because it utilized a similar vertical volute spring suspension (VVSS) and general layout. However, the Nahuel featured sloped armor (80mm thick on the front) similar to later Sherman variants or even the German Panther, making it better protected than early-production Shermans (76mm).
T-34 (Soviet Union): While the Nahuel was influenced by American mechanicals, its hull design drew inspiration from the T-34's sloped armor profile. This provided a significantly higher "effective armor" thickness—nearly 140mm on the front glacicompared to many of its contemporaries.
Cromwell (United Kingdom): Like the Cromwell, the Nahuel was a fast medium tank for its time, with a top speed of 40 km/h. Both tanks were designed to balance mobility with enough firepower to support infantry.
Panzer III & IV (Germany): In its initial configuration, the Nahuel's firepower was roughly comparable to mid-war Panzer models. However, the Nahuel was severely hampered by its armament—a repurposed Krupp 1909 field gun—which lacked the high-velocity anti-tank rounds found on German Panzers.
Technological Stand-outs
Engine: It was powered by a 500 HP FMA-Lorraine-Dietrich 12 Eb aircraft engine, which gave it a superior power-to-weight ratio (14.3 hp/tonne) than many Sherman models, leading to better mobility and range.
Cast Turret: The Nahuel featured a single-piece cast turret, a manufacturing feat only achieved by major powers like France, the US, and the USSR at the time.
Direct Comparisons to Major WWII Tanks
M4 Sherman (United States): The Nahuel is often called the "Argentine Sherman" because it utilized a similar vertical volute spring suspension (VVSS) and general layout. However, the Nahuel featured sloped armor (80mm thick on the front) similar to later Sherman variants or even the German Panther, making it better protected than early-production Shermans (76mm).
T-34 (Soviet Union): While the Nahuel was influenced by American mechanicals, its hull design drew inspiration from the T-34's sloped armor profile. This provided a significantly higher "effective armor" thickness—nearly 140mm on the front glacicompared to many of its contemporaries.
Cromwell (United Kingdom): Like the Cromwell, the Nahuel was a fast medium tank for its time, with a top speed of 40 km/h. Both tanks were designed to balance mobility with enough firepower to support infantry.
Panzer III & IV (Germany): In its initial configuration, the Nahuel's firepower was roughly comparable to mid-war Panzer models. However, the Nahuel was severely hampered by its armament—a repurposed Krupp 1909 field gun—which lacked the high-velocity anti-tank rounds found on German Panzers.
Technological Stand-outs
Engine: It was powered by a 500 HP FMA-Lorraine-Dietrich 12 Eb aircraft engine, which gave it a superior power-to-weight ratio (14.3 hp/tonne) than many Sherman models, leading to better mobility and range.
Cast Turret: The Nahuel featured a single-piece cast turret, a manufacturing feat only achieved by major powers like France, the US, and the USSR at the time.
Lieut. Colonel Baisi (designer of the Nahuel) in the commander position. The Nahuel 121 series had 3 machine guns in the front and 1 in the tower.
In many technical aspects,the Nahuel DL-43 was arguably superior to the mass-produced Italian and Japanese tanks of the early-to-mid war, though it fell behind the advanced late-war designs of those nations.
Comparison with Italian Tanks
Superiority Over M13/40 and M14/41: The Nahuel was significantly more powerful than the backbone of the Italian armored forces. It had nearly twice the armor thickness (80mm vs. 42mm max) and a much larger 75mm gun compared to the Italian 47mm.
The P40 Challenge: The Italian P40 (P26/40), introduced in 1943, was Italy's only true peer to the Nahuel.
Armor: The Nahuel had a slight edge with 80mm of sloped frontal armor (effective ~140mm) compared to the P40's 50mm sloped.
Firepower: The P40 was superior here; it used a dedicated high-velocity 75mm anti-tank gun, whereas the Nahuel was hampered by its low-velocity Krupp field gun that lacked effective anti-tank rounds.
Comparison with Japanese Tanks
Superiority Over Type 97 Chi-Ha: The Nahuel outclassed the most common Japanese medium tank in every metric. The Chi-Ha’s maximum armor was only 25mm–33mm, making it paper-thin compared to the Nahuel’s 80mm.
The Type 3 Chi-Nu: This 1944 Japanese tank was built specifically to counter the M4 Sherman.
Armor: The Nahuel remained significantly better protected; the Chi-Nu only had 50mm of vertical frontal armor.
Firepower: Similar to the Italian P40, the Chi-Nu featured a superior long-barreled 75mm Type 3 gun designed for tank-on-tank combat.
Mobility: The Nahuel’s 500 HP aviation engine gave it a higher power-to-weight ratio than most Japanese tanks, though Japanese tanks were generally lighter and more suited for jungle terrain.
Comparison with Italian Tanks
Superiority Over M13/40 and M14/41: The Nahuel was significantly more powerful than the backbone of the Italian armored forces. It had nearly twice the armor thickness (80mm vs. 42mm max) and a much larger 75mm gun compared to the Italian 47mm.
The P40 Challenge: The Italian P40 (P26/40), introduced in 1943, was Italy's only true peer to the Nahuel.
Armor: The Nahuel had a slight edge with 80mm of sloped frontal armor (effective ~140mm) compared to the P40's 50mm sloped.
Firepower: The P40 was superior here; it used a dedicated high-velocity 75mm anti-tank gun, whereas the Nahuel was hampered by its low-velocity Krupp field gun that lacked effective anti-tank rounds.
Comparison with Japanese Tanks
Superiority Over Type 97 Chi-Ha: The Nahuel outclassed the most common Japanese medium tank in every metric. The Chi-Ha’s maximum armor was only 25mm–33mm, making it paper-thin compared to the Nahuel’s 80mm.
The Type 3 Chi-Nu: This 1944 Japanese tank was built specifically to counter the M4 Sherman.
Armor: The Nahuel remained significantly better protected; the Chi-Nu only had 50mm of vertical frontal armor.
Firepower: Similar to the Italian P40, the Chi-Nu featured a superior long-barreled 75mm Type 3 gun designed for tank-on-tank combat.
Mobility: The Nahuel’s 500 HP aviation engine gave it a higher power-to-weight ratio than most Japanese tanks, though Japanese tanks were generally lighter and more suited for jungle terrain.
The Nahuel DL-43 was the first indigenous tank produced in South America. It was also the first tank developed in Latin America to be produced in any significant quantity (approximately 12–16 units)
Some weak points that in my opinion need to be taken into account.
The Weapon: A Field Gun in a Tank's Body
The biggest weakness was the 7.65mm (or 75mm) Krupp Model 1909 Field Gun.
Low Muzzle Velocity: This was a towed artillery piece designed for indirect fire, not an anti-tank gun. It lacked the high-velocity "punch" needed to penetrate the thick armor of 1944-era tanks like the Panther or Tiger.
Obsolete Ammunition: It primarily fired high-explosive (HE) shells. While great for infantry support, it lacked modern Armor-Piercing (AP) rounds. In a tank duel, a Nahuel would have had to get dangerously close to do any damage.
The "Improvisation" Factor: Argentina used the Krupp because it was what they had in stock. Because of the WWII arms embargo, they couldn't import specialized high-velocity tank guns from the US or Europe.
The Chassis: Power vs. Reliability
While the engine was powerful, the chassis and drivetrain were "Frankensteined" together.
Aircraft Engine Issues: The FMA-Lorraine-Dietrich 12 Eb was a liquid-cooled W12 aircraft engine. These are notoriously finicky in tanks; they require massive cooling systems (which added weight) and high-octane fuel, and they aren't designed for the high-torque, low-speed "grinding" that tank transmissions endure.
The ignition system of the Nahuel DL-43 was a significant technical burden, largely because it was inherited from its specialized aviation engine. The tank was powered by the FMA-Lorraine-Dietrich 12 Eb, a W-12 aircraft engine produced under license in Argentina. Because it was designed for flight, its ignition system had specific characteristics that translated poorly to a ground-based armored vehicle:
Untested Drivetrain: Unlike the Sherman, which had years of iterative testing on its transmission and tracks, the Nahuel's internal components were often one-off or adapted parts. This led to mechanical unreliability—several of the 12 units built suffered from frequent breakdowns during maneuvers.
Weight Distribution: The heavy armor and cooling systems pushed the chassis to its limit, stressing the suspension system (which was a near-copy of the Sherman's VVSS).
The Nahuel was a top-tier hull searching for a real tank engine and gun. If Argentina had been able to fit it with a high-velocity 75mm gun (like the Sherman's M3) and a dedicated tank engine, it likely would have stayed in production much longer. Instead, it was easier and cheaper to buy surplus Shermans after 1945.
Some weak points that in my opinion need to be taken into account.
The Weapon: A Field Gun in a Tank's Body
The biggest weakness was the 7.65mm (or 75mm) Krupp Model 1909 Field Gun.
Low Muzzle Velocity: This was a towed artillery piece designed for indirect fire, not an anti-tank gun. It lacked the high-velocity "punch" needed to penetrate the thick armor of 1944-era tanks like the Panther or Tiger.
Obsolete Ammunition: It primarily fired high-explosive (HE) shells. While great for infantry support, it lacked modern Armor-Piercing (AP) rounds. In a tank duel, a Nahuel would have had to get dangerously close to do any damage.
The "Improvisation" Factor: Argentina used the Krupp because it was what they had in stock. Because of the WWII arms embargo, they couldn't import specialized high-velocity tank guns from the US or Europe.
The Chassis: Power vs. Reliability
While the engine was powerful, the chassis and drivetrain were "Frankensteined" together.
Aircraft Engine Issues: The FMA-Lorraine-Dietrich 12 Eb was a liquid-cooled W12 aircraft engine. These are notoriously finicky in tanks; they require massive cooling systems (which added weight) and high-octane fuel, and they aren't designed for the high-torque, low-speed "grinding" that tank transmissions endure.
The ignition system of the Nahuel DL-43 was a significant technical burden, largely because it was inherited from its specialized aviation engine. The tank was powered by the FMA-Lorraine-Dietrich 12 Eb, a W-12 aircraft engine produced under license in Argentina. Because it was designed for flight, its ignition system had specific characteristics that translated poorly to a ground-based armored vehicle:
Untested Drivetrain: Unlike the Sherman, which had years of iterative testing on its transmission and tracks, the Nahuel's internal components were often one-off or adapted parts. This led to mechanical unreliability—several of the 12 units built suffered from frequent breakdowns during maneuvers.
Weight Distribution: The heavy armor and cooling systems pushed the chassis to its limit, stressing the suspension system (which was a near-copy of the Sherman's VVSS).
The Nahuel was a top-tier hull searching for a real tank engine and gun. If Argentina had been able to fit it with a high-velocity 75mm gun (like the Sherman's M3) and a dedicated tank engine, it likely would have stayed in production much longer. Instead, it was easier and cheaper to buy surplus Shermans after 1945.
|
Beyond the standard medium tank, the arsenal explored several specialized configurations for the DL-43 chassis:
Original 1943: Also referred to as Model A-1, this was the initial prototype and pre-production series. The most famous innovation was the mounting of the Krupp Model 1909 75mm field gun into the rotating turret of the DL-43. This required a custom-designed recoil mechanism to fit the gun inside the cramped tank turret. The arsenal integrated a mix of 7.65 mm Madsen and Allan machine guns into the DL-43, optimizing it for infantry support. |
Local Radio Manufacturing: The arsenal collaborated with the DGFM (Dirección General de Fabricaciones Militares) to produce the TRC-1 radio unit, a domestic adaptation of the high-quality German Telefunken 5WS transmitter and the ukw.E.e receiver.. This was a sophisticated domestic copy of the German Telefunken 5WS transmitter, allowing Argentine tanks to communicate using indigenous technology.
Upgraded DL-43 (1947): After the war, the existing 12 units were overhauled with new crew hatches, modern radios, and improved tool storage to keep them operational alongside newer surplus Shermans.
During a post-war overhaul, the locally produced TRC-1 radios in the Nahuel DL-43 tanks were replaced by the British Wireless Set No. 19 (WS-19).
Upgraded DL-43 (1947): After the war, the existing 12 units were overhauled with new crew hatches, modern radios, and improved tool storage to keep them operational alongside newer surplus Shermans.
During a post-war overhaul, the locally produced TRC-1 radios in the Nahuel DL-43 tanks were replaced by the British Wireless Set No. 19 (WS-19).
Despite being a landmark of South American industrial history, the small fleet of 12 (or 16, according to some records) was entirely lost to time due to a few specific reasons:
After World War II, Argentina was able to purchase massive amounts of surplus British and Belgian Shermans at extremely low prices. The complex, hand-built Nahuels simply couldn't compete with the ease of maintenance and parts availability of the Sherman.
In the early 1960s, the remaining tanks were officially "phased out". Most were sold for scrap metal, while others were allegedly used as hard targets for target practice by the very Shermans that replaced them.
Missing Documentation: Along with the physical tanks, much of the original technical documentation and blueprints were destroyed, making the exact dimensions and certain technical details a mystery for modern historians.
After World War II, Argentina was able to purchase massive amounts of surplus British and Belgian Shermans at extremely low prices. The complex, hand-built Nahuels simply couldn't compete with the ease of maintenance and parts availability of the Sherman.
In the early 1960s, the remaining tanks were officially "phased out". Most were sold for scrap metal, while others were allegedly used as hard targets for target practice by the very Shermans that replaced them.
Missing Documentation: Along with the physical tanks, much of the original technical documentation and blueprints were destroyed, making the exact dimensions and certain technical details a mystery for modern historians.
M4 A2 Sherman. Engine: Continental R975 C1, air-cooled, Radial, gasoline.
Crusader SP Tractor Gun. (Post-war modification) . V-12-cyl.340-bhp rear mounted engine (Nuffield Liberty). Armament: Krupp 75mm l.30 mod. 1909 and Bofors 75mm L40 Mod. 1935 field gun. plus three Madsen Mod. 1926 light machine guns 7,65 mm Mauser.
The Crusader with 75 mm Bofors was an Argentine self-propelled gun (SPG) created by mounting a pre-war Bofors 75 mm L/40 Model 1935 field gun onto surplus British Crusader Gun Tractor chassis.
The Bofors 75 mm L/40 was a long-barreled field gun that provided significantly better range and anti-tank performance than the shorter 75 mm Krupp field guns used on other variants.
Superstructure: To house the crew and the gun, Argentine engineers built an enlarged, boxy, open-top superstructure atop the original tank tractor hull.
Performance: Weighing approximately 19 tons and powered by a 340 HP Nuffield Liberty engine, the vehicle maintained a decent top speed of 48 km/h, though it lacked heavy protection.
The Bofors 75 mm L/40 was a long-barreled field gun that provided significantly better range and anti-tank performance than the shorter 75 mm Krupp field guns used on other variants.
Superstructure: To house the crew and the gun, Argentine engineers built an enlarged, boxy, open-top superstructure atop the original tank tractor hull.
Performance: Weighing approximately 19 tons and powered by a 340 HP Nuffield Liberty engine, the vehicle maintained a decent top speed of 48 km/h, though it lacked heavy protection.
Crusader W/ 75mm Bofors
|
In the 1940s and 1950s, Argentina experimented with multiple rocket launchers (MRLs) on the Crusader tank chassis, which they had acquired as surplus Crusader Gun Tractors after World War II.
Six 21cm (210mm) rockets: Likely inspired by or using components from the German Nebelwerfer 42 systems. Forty 8cm (80mm) rockets: A high-capacity configuration for smaller caliber rockets. Argentina purchased approximately 100 to 300 surplus Crusader gun tractors (vehicles with the turrets already removed) in the late 1940s. While most were converted into Self-Propelled Guns (SPGs) carrying 75mm Bofors, 75mm Krupp, or 105mm Schneider/French howitzers, the rocket launcher version remained a rare experimental variant from this same modernization program. |
Later in the Cold War, Argentina developed more famous truck-mounted MRLs like the 105mm SLAM Pampero, but these were based on Unimog trucks rather than the old Crusader tanks.
In 1943, Argentina's Dirección General de Fabricaciones Militares (DGFM), under the leadership of General Manuel Savio, initiated a major self-sufficiency program to develop domestic artillery and rocket systems due to WWII-era arms embargoes.
Rocket Systems Developed Around 1943. 75mm and 105mm Rockets: These were the initial experimental calibers used to test stabilization and propellant. They were eventually intended for multi-tube launchers to provide mass saturation fire, similar to the Soviet Katyusha or German Nebelwerfer.
"Proyectil Autopropulsado de 15 cm" (15 cm Self-Propelled Projectile), an experimental rocket developed by the Argentine Army's Fabricaciones Militares (DGFM) starting around 1943. While the 155mm caliber is famous today for tube artillery, this 15cm (150mm) system was a rocket-based project inspired by contemporary German and Soviet developments.
In 1943, Argentina's Dirección General de Fabricaciones Militares (DGFM), under the leadership of General Manuel Savio, initiated a major self-sufficiency program to develop domestic artillery and rocket systems due to WWII-era arms embargoes.
Rocket Systems Developed Around 1943. 75mm and 105mm Rockets: These were the initial experimental calibers used to test stabilization and propellant. They were eventually intended for multi-tube launchers to provide mass saturation fire, similar to the Soviet Katyusha or German Nebelwerfer.
"Proyectil Autopropulsado de 15 cm" (15 cm Self-Propelled Projectile), an experimental rocket developed by the Argentine Army's Fabricaciones Militares (DGFM) starting around 1943. While the 155mm caliber is famous today for tube artillery, this 15cm (150mm) system was a rocket-based project inspired by contemporary German and Soviet developments.
 |
 |
Above are Model T16 armored personal Carriers (Madsen Gun Carriers), in a parade. These vehicles were built by Ford in the US with the Ford Mercury 239ci engine and some modifications plus an extra wheel in the rear for better load and land stability. These vehicles were known as Bren Gun Carriers because of the Bren machine guns that British transported on them. In the Argentine case, their version of the English example could be referred to as the "Madsen Gun Carrier". The driver's position is on the right with a gunner on the left. The transmission, engine and rear axle came from other wheeled vehicles which led to a wear down of the parts. The rear bogie had 2 wheels on each side for extra stability (the Universal only had 1 wheel on each side of the rear bogie). The T16 did not have the stepped rear hull like other carriers. Compared side by side, the T16 Universal Carrier and the Universal Carrier Mark I are 2 very distinct machines, although they were both made by Ford. The T16 had very limited use in the US.
Source: Military Vehicles Magazine
Source: Military Vehicles Magazine
Above are M9 Half-Track Personnel Carriers during a parade circa 1950.
British-Sherman IC Hybrid, M9 halftruck, Sherman Firefly, T-16 carrier and Willys.
Sherman Firefly Mk Ic. This photo is from 1950 showing a parade celebrating August 17, the Day of San Martin. Photo publication from the time.
British Medium Tank M3 Grant.
The Medium Tank M3 was an American tank used during World War II. In Britain the tank was called "General Lee", named after General Robert E. Lee, and its modified version built to British specification, with a new turret, was called "General Grant", named after General Ulysses S. Grant.
The Medium Tank M3 was an American tank used during World War II. In Britain the tank was called "General Lee", named after General Robert E. Lee, and its modified version built to British specification, with a new turret, was called "General Grant", named after General Ulysses S. Grant.
US M9 halftrack.
 |
 |
M16 Half-track (M3 base Multiple Gun Motor Carriage equipped with Maxon Mount with M2HB machine guns. Ordnance Museum Abeerdeen.
Images of the now-extinct Motorized Regiment " Motorizados Buenos Aires" from a soldier's 1954 yearbook.
Field kitchen Kärcher
Motorized BsAs from 1940s
10th Armored Cavalry Regiment (Pueyrredon Hussars). 1965.
Crew of a Firefly Mk Vc in front of their tank, waiting to begin practice.
Tankers during a parade celebrating the pledge of allegiance.
The tank crew's uniform in this picture is a simple overall in olive green, like the US Army HBT mechanic overall (Third Pattern), with combat boots (borcegui). The Argentine Tanker Helmet is inspired by the French model from the 1950s that was inspired by the American tanker helmets from WII. It was a semi-spherical, hard aluminum piece, perforated with holes on the surface, covered with rubber. It had a leather sling strap for their 1911 holsters.
1962 Azules vs Colorados.
Mechanized Infantry of the 10th Armored cavalry "Hussars of Pueyrredon".
 |
 |
The 10th Armored Cavalry Regiment, consisting of a tank company and 2 mechanized infantry rifles (Tiradores blindados). Photos from a regiment soldier's yearbook in 1965.
 3rd Mechanized Regiment "Gral Belgrano". |
|
 |
8th Cavalry Horse Rifles Regiment "Cazadores General Necochea" and 10th Armored Cavalry, Hussars "Husares of Pueyrredon"
Historic uniform for Hussar of the 8th Tanks Regiment (Magdalena). The soldier is dressed in a typical dolman jacket and colback shako. The boots are a Hungarian style. 1963: The attack on the Magdalena tank regiment occurred on April 3, 1963, during a violent internal military conflict in Argentina known as the Azules y Colorados (Blues and Reds) revolt. As the Azules mobilized to suppress the revolt, Navy fighter planes (the Colorados) launched a surprise air strike to halt an advancing Army tank column. The 8th Tank Regiment (then part of the Agrupación Blindada Magdalena), which was loyal to the Azules. The Navy deployed F9F Panther jets and F4U Corsair and AT-6 Texan propeller planes from the Punta Indio Naval Air Base. The naval aircraft used machine guns, rockets, and napalm against the armored column. Reports indicate that 8 to 9 soldiers were killed and roughly 18 to 22 were wounded during the bombardment at Magdalena |
The Craters Today
For decades, the "holes" on Route 11 served as a grim physical memorial of the internal conflict. Because the area is marshy and the road was poorly maintained for years, the uneven patches where the craters were filled remained visible to drivers as a series of noticeable dips and bumps in the road surface near the entrance to the Magdalena base.
While modern paving has smoothed over much of the original damage, locals and military historians still point to specific stretches of the road as the site where "the Navy bombed the Army."
This event remains one of the most surreal moments in Argentine history—the only time the Argentine Navy bombed Argentine Army tanks on a public highway.
For decades, the "holes" on Route 11 served as a grim physical memorial of the internal conflict. Because the area is marshy and the road was poorly maintained for years, the uneven patches where the craters were filled remained visible to drivers as a series of noticeable dips and bumps in the road surface near the entrance to the Magdalena base.
While modern paving has smoothed over much of the original damage, locals and military historians still point to specific stretches of the road as the site where "the Navy bombed the Army."
This event remains one of the most surreal moments in Argentine history—the only time the Argentine Navy bombed Argentine Army tanks on a public highway.
Mechanized soldier poses in front of an M4 A4 Sherman with 75mm M3 L/40 gun.
Tanker Helmets. semi-spherical patterns:
Vickers Carden Loyd Tankette Mod. 1934. Argentine Model 1938. Armament 7,65mm (Argentine Customized). The helmets and uniforms for this vehicle, were the standard uniform for all branches and included the fiber M36 helmet, German shape. The picture is not good quality, but in this picture the tankist locks like it has a semi-spheric helmet.
In this photo you can see clearly that the rider has a spherical helmet. It also appears to have glasses, although they cannot be seen as well. In the rear of the photo are Nahuel tanks.
While these old Vickers paraded in Buenos Aires, modern tanks had been beating each other in a Europe turned into a Roman Colosseum: Soviet T-34-85, T-44, IS-2 "Joseph Stalin", German 70-ton Tiger II (Tiger King), Jagdpanzer 38(t), Panzer IV Ausf. J. US and UK, M4A3E8 "Easy Eight" Sherman with 76mm gun, M24 Chaffee, M26 Pershing, Sherman Firefly, A British modification of the American M4 Sherman that became vital in 1944, equipped with a powerful 17-pounder gun specifically to deal with Panthers and Tigers.
While these old Vickers paraded in Buenos Aires, modern tanks had been beating each other in a Europe turned into a Roman Colosseum: Soviet T-34-85, T-44, IS-2 "Joseph Stalin", German 70-ton Tiger II (Tiger King), Jagdpanzer 38(t), Panzer IV Ausf. J. US and UK, M4A3E8 "Easy Eight" Sherman with 76mm gun, M24 Chaffee, M26 Pershing, Sherman Firefly, A British modification of the American M4 Sherman that became vital in 1944, equipped with a powerful 17-pounder gun specifically to deal with Panthers and Tigers.
Interesting photo where you can see a tank helmet First Pattern, from a DL 43 Nahuel crew. It appears to have headphones (telefunken Panzer type?) and devices. This helmet is very similar in form to a parachutist helmet.
Argentine Tankers (Second pattern), helmet from the 1950s. This piece is in the Military Museum (Museo de Armas de la Nacion). Photo from Mariano Gonzalez Lacroix.
Foreign Patterns:
Argentine leather helmet, original or copy (?) of the Telemit, Belgian tank helmet made by VanDePutte, 1970s. for the Sherman Upgrade with 105mm L44 DGFM Gun during the Beagle Conflict in 1978. These upgraded Tanks were equipped with Dutch Philips VHF transceiver. French technicians worked on the upgrades. Photos: ExpCab9
General Belgrano Mechanized Infantry Regiment No. 3 (RIM 3).
1942 Tank Telescope-periscope. This type of telescope (M51 and M70) could be used in the Sherman tanks, among others, in addition to being for land artillery and naval gunner cannons.
US M4A1E8 76mm Sherman next to an Canadian Firefly.
Canadian Firefly vc and US M4 Sherman. (US Army Ordnance Museum)
Above is the Sherman suspension system (bogy), Vertical Volute Spring System (VVSS). This example does not have the "offset roller" This is the most common type on Sherman tanks. The wheels are the early type and measure approximately 17 inches. They are covered with rubber.
Above: Vertical Volute Spring System (VVSS).
Below: Horizontall Volute Spring System (HVSS).
Below: Horizontall Volute Spring System (HVSS).
Two different types of wheels on the same tank. On the left is the older model, the right is the newer one. The early wheel is very similar to that of the Nahuel.
Right: Front Track wheel. Left: Rear Tensioner Wheel. Note the off-set roller guide above the roadwheel.
Torsion bar spring suspension of the M41 "Walker-Bulldog" and M42 "Duster" models.
M41 “Walker Bulldog” Light Tank circa 1966. In 1963 through the Military Assistance Program (MAP) talks began to receive tanks from the US. Argentina was only able to acquire 5 tanks due to the coup in 1966. Some feel that it was actually a good thing because Argentina was forced to make its own tanks, Tanque Aregentino Mediano (TAM). Another heavy tank, an M60 Patton a first-generation main battle tank (MBT) came to Argentina for testing but was not selected due to its weight on the soft Argentine soil..
AMX-13 circa 1970. French tank from the Plan Europa. The also received SK-105 "SK-105 Kürassier", which is the Austrian version of the same tank. The Kurassier was used in the Patagonian Region.
The AMX-13 light tank occupies a unique chapter in Argentine military history as one of the few armored vehicles assembled locally under license.
Local Production and Variants
Argentina was the only country outside of France to produce the AMX-13 and its specialized weaponry.
Local Assembly: Starting in the late 1960s, Argentina began assembling the AMX-13/105 variant using components supplied by France.
Armament: The Argentine version featured a powerful 105 mm gun mounted in the signature oscillating turret, which allowed for a compact design and an autoloader system.
Beyond the standard tank, Argentina operated the AMX-VCI (Armored Personnel Carrier), the AMX Mk F3 (155 mm self-propelled howitzer), and the AMX-13 PDP (armored bridge-layer).
The AMX-13 light tank occupies a unique chapter in Argentine military history as one of the few armored vehicles assembled locally under license.
Local Production and Variants
Argentina was the only country outside of France to produce the AMX-13 and its specialized weaponry.
Local Assembly: Starting in the late 1960s, Argentina began assembling the AMX-13/105 variant using components supplied by France.
Armament: The Argentine version featured a powerful 105 mm gun mounted in the signature oscillating turret, which allowed for a compact design and an autoloader system.
Beyond the standard tank, Argentina operated the AMX-VCI (Armored Personnel Carrier), the AMX Mk F3 (155 mm self-propelled howitzer), and the AMX-13 PDP (armored bridge-layer).
The M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC) has been the backbone of Argentina's mechanized infantry for over 50 years, with a fleet of approximately 500 vehicles currently in service.
(1967): The Argentine Army received its first 250 M113A1 units from the United States, along with command and cargo variants.
Specialized Argentine Variants
The Comando de Arsenales has developed several local modifications to suit specific mission needs:
M113 Defensa Aérea: Equipped with a 20 mm Oerlikon cannon for anti-aircraft and ground support.
M113A2 RASIT: Features a ground-surveillance radar for reconnaissance.
M106A2: A mortar carrier modified to house a 120 mm FM mortar.
M113 Sanitario: An armored ambulance configuration for battlefield medical evacuation.
Combat & Operational Role
South Atlantic (1982): Unlike the wheeled AML-90, the M113 did not see major deployment on the islands; instead, Argentine forces primarily utilized LVTP-7 amphibious vehicles during the initial invasion.
Technical Capabilities
The M113's enduring popularity in Argentina is due to its aluminum hull, which makes it light enough to be amphibious and transportable by C-130 Hercules aircraft.
(1967): The Argentine Army received its first 250 M113A1 units from the United States, along with command and cargo variants.
Specialized Argentine Variants
The Comando de Arsenales has developed several local modifications to suit specific mission needs:
M113 Defensa Aérea: Equipped with a 20 mm Oerlikon cannon for anti-aircraft and ground support.
M113A2 RASIT: Features a ground-surveillance radar for reconnaissance.
M106A2: A mortar carrier modified to house a 120 mm FM mortar.
M113 Sanitario: An armored ambulance configuration for battlefield medical evacuation.
Combat & Operational Role
South Atlantic (1982): Unlike the wheeled AML-90, the M113 did not see major deployment on the islands; instead, Argentine forces primarily utilized LVTP-7 amphibious vehicles during the initial invasion.
Technical Capabilities
The M113's enduring popularity in Argentina is due to its aluminum hull, which makes it light enough to be amphibious and transportable by C-130 Hercules aircraft.
SK-105 Kürassier. Photo "La Semana", April.29, 1982.
During the South Atlantic War, even the TAM medium tanks had not left the factory. In the territory of the TOAS (Theater of Operations), SK-105 tanks were deployed to reinforce defensive positions in the event of an eventual invasion of the United Kingdom in Patagonia.
During the South Atlantic War, even the TAM medium tanks had not left the factory. In the territory of the TOAS (Theater of Operations), SK-105 tanks were deployed to reinforce defensive positions in the event of an eventual invasion of the United Kingdom in Patagonia.
Argentine AML 90 Panhard now in Portsmouth Hampshire, Naval shipyard UK. This is an English naval postcard. The armored vehicle was apparently abandoned by the Argentines then taken to England after the war.
The Panhard AML-90 is a highly recognizable light armored reconnaissance vehicle, primarily famous for its role during the 1982 Falklands War (Guerra de las Malvinas).
Service in the South Atlantic War 1982
During the conflict, the Argentine Army deployed 12 AML-90s to the islands. They belonged to the 181st Armored Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron and the 10th Armored Cavalry Exploration Squadron.
Based primarily in Port Stanley (Puerto Argentino), they served as a mobile reserve. The boggy, soft terrain of the islands severely restricted these wheeled vehicles to the town's paved roads, preventing them from engaging in significant combat across the countryside.
Following the Argentine surrender, all 12 units were abandoned. Some were destroyed, while two were eventually taken to the United Kingdom for display at the Tank Museum and the Household Cavalry Museum.
Service in the South Atlantic War 1982
During the conflict, the Argentine Army deployed 12 AML-90s to the islands. They belonged to the 181st Armored Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron and the 10th Armored Cavalry Exploration Squadron.
Based primarily in Port Stanley (Puerto Argentino), they served as a mobile reserve. The boggy, soft terrain of the islands severely restricted these wheeled vehicles to the town's paved roads, preventing them from engaging in significant combat across the countryside.
Following the Argentine surrender, all 12 units were abandoned. Some were destroyed, while two were eventually taken to the United Kingdom for display at the Tank Museum and the Household Cavalry Museum.
While the FV101 Scorpion and the Panhard AML-90 were the primary armored vehicles of the British and Argentine forces during the 1982 Malvinas War, they rarely engaged each other directly due to the islands' difficult terrain.
The British FV101 Scorpion (tracked) had exceptionally low ground pressure, allowing it to traverse boggy peat that was impassable for other vehicles.
The Argentine Panhard AML-90 (wheeled) was restricted to the few paved roads around Port Stanley. If they moved off-road, they risked sinking into the soft ground.
Armament:
The Scorpion featured a 76mm L23A1 gun designed for fire support.
The AML-90 carried a more powerful 90mm F1 gun capable of firing anti-armor rounds, though it was largely used in a static defense role during the conflict.
Direct Engagements:
The only notable armor-versus-armor encounter occurred during the Battle of Wireless Ridge (June 13–14, 1982).
Scorpions and Scimitars of the Blues and Royals provided fire support for the 2nd Battalion, Parachute Regiment, while Argentine AML-90s attempted to counter them, though no tank-on-tank kills were officially confirmed.
The British FV101 Scorpion (tracked) had exceptionally low ground pressure, allowing it to traverse boggy peat that was impassable for other vehicles.
The Argentine Panhard AML-90 (wheeled) was restricted to the few paved roads around Port Stanley. If they moved off-road, they risked sinking into the soft ground.
Armament:
The Scorpion featured a 76mm L23A1 gun designed for fire support.
The AML-90 carried a more powerful 90mm F1 gun capable of firing anti-armor rounds, though it was largely used in a static defense role during the conflict.
Direct Engagements:
The only notable armor-versus-armor encounter occurred during the Battle of Wireless Ridge (June 13–14, 1982).
Scorpions and Scimitars of the Blues and Royals provided fire support for the 2nd Battalion, Parachute Regiment, while Argentine AML-90s attempted to counter them, though no tank-on-tank kills were officially confirmed.
T.A.M "Tanque Argentino Mediano" TAMSE:
Developed in 1974 by Germany’s Thyssen-Henschel on a modified Marder infantry fighting vehicle chassis to meet Argentina’s specific geographical needs (low weight, high autonomy).
TAMSE: The state-owned company Tanque Argentino Mediano Sociedad del Estado was created to manufacture the family of vehicles but was liquidated in 1996.
Variants: The TAM chassis served as the base for several versions, including the VCTP (Infantry Combat Vehicle), VCA (155 mm Palmaria artillery), and the VCLC (Multiple Rocket Launcher).
TAMSE: The state-owned company Tanque Argentino Mediano Sociedad del Estado was created to manufacture the family of vehicles but was liquidated in 1996.
Variants: The TAM chassis served as the base for several versions, including the VCTP (Infantry Combat Vehicle), VCA (155 mm Palmaria artillery), and the VCLC (Multiple Rocket Launcher).
The Tanque Argentino Mediano ("Argentine Medium Tank"), or TAM. The vehicle was developed by a German (Thyssen-Henschel) and Argentine team of engineers (T.A.M.S.E), and was based on the chassis of the German Marder infantry fighting vehicle.
The history of TAMSE (Tanque Argentino Mediano Sociedad del Estado) is a saga of ambitious industrialization followed by a slow, painful decline that mirrors the broader "de-industrialization" of Argentina's strategic sectors.
In the early 70s, Argentina faced a dilemma: its Sherman fleet was obsolete, and the rugged terrain of the Andes and the soft soil of the Pampas made heavy tanks (like the American M60) impractical.
Argentina signed a contract with West Germany’s Thyssen-Henschel.
They used the chassis of the Marder Infantry Fighting Vehicle as a base. This created a fast, highly mobile 30-ton tank with a powerful 105 mm gun.
In 1980, TAMSE was officially established as a state-owned company with a massive 30,000-square-meter plant in Boulogne Sur Mer, Buenos Aires.
The Golden Age of Production (1980–1990)
At its peak, TAMSE was a point of national pride, proving that a "mixogenic" Latin American country could build a complex armored family:
Mass Production: TAMSE produced over 200 TAM tanks and nearly 150 VCTP (Infantry Combat Vehicles).
The Family Concept: TAMSE didn't just build a tank; they built a modular platform. They developed versions for Command, Mortars, Ambulances, and even the VCA Palmaria (a massive 155 mm self-propelled howitzer).
Export Hopes: TAMSE attempted to export the tank to countries like Iran, Malaysia, and Peru, but international political pressure (mostly from the UK after the 1982 war) blocked almost all sales.
The Death Blow: The 1990s and Privatization
The decline of TAMSE was not caused by a battlefield defeat, but by a shift in economic ideology.
The Liquidation: In 1996, under the Carlos Menem administration (the same era that cancelled the Cóndor II missile), TAMSE was ordered to be liquidated.
Loss of Knowledge: The factory doors were closed, the specialized workforce was dispersed, and the machinery was sold or mothballed. Argentina stopped being a producer of tanks and became a maintainer of old ones.
The 2026 Reality: Dependence
Because the TAMSE industrial chain was broken in 1996, Argentina lost the ability to produce the "brain" of the tank. This is why, in 2026, the Army must turn to Israel’s Elbit Systems for the TAM 2C-A2 modernization.
The Turret Work: The current modernization is performed at the Army's 601 and 602 Arsenals in the old TAMSE facility, but they are essentially "assembling" foreign kits rather than manufacturing from scratch.
It remains a case study of how a country can reach strategic independence and then voluntarily dismantle it, only to pay a much higher price decades later to keep the same hardware running.
In the early 70s, Argentina faced a dilemma: its Sherman fleet was obsolete, and the rugged terrain of the Andes and the soft soil of the Pampas made heavy tanks (like the American M60) impractical.
Argentina signed a contract with West Germany’s Thyssen-Henschel.
They used the chassis of the Marder Infantry Fighting Vehicle as a base. This created a fast, highly mobile 30-ton tank with a powerful 105 mm gun.
In 1980, TAMSE was officially established as a state-owned company with a massive 30,000-square-meter plant in Boulogne Sur Mer, Buenos Aires.
The Golden Age of Production (1980–1990)
At its peak, TAMSE was a point of national pride, proving that a "mixogenic" Latin American country could build a complex armored family:
Mass Production: TAMSE produced over 200 TAM tanks and nearly 150 VCTP (Infantry Combat Vehicles).
The Family Concept: TAMSE didn't just build a tank; they built a modular platform. They developed versions for Command, Mortars, Ambulances, and even the VCA Palmaria (a massive 155 mm self-propelled howitzer).
Export Hopes: TAMSE attempted to export the tank to countries like Iran, Malaysia, and Peru, but international political pressure (mostly from the UK after the 1982 war) blocked almost all sales.
The Death Blow: The 1990s and Privatization
The decline of TAMSE was not caused by a battlefield defeat, but by a shift in economic ideology.
The Liquidation: In 1996, under the Carlos Menem administration (the same era that cancelled the Cóndor II missile), TAMSE was ordered to be liquidated.
Loss of Knowledge: The factory doors were closed, the specialized workforce was dispersed, and the machinery was sold or mothballed. Argentina stopped being a producer of tanks and became a maintainer of old ones.
The 2026 Reality: Dependence
Because the TAMSE industrial chain was broken in 1996, Argentina lost the ability to produce the "brain" of the tank. This is why, in 2026, the Army must turn to Israel’s Elbit Systems for the TAM 2C-A2 modernization.
The Turret Work: The current modernization is performed at the Army's 601 and 602 Arsenals in the old TAMSE facility, but they are essentially "assembling" foreign kits rather than manufacturing from scratch.
It remains a case study of how a country can reach strategic independence and then voluntarily dismantle it, only to pay a much higher price decades later to keep the same hardware running.
2026 Modernization: It is a stinging irony * of Argentine industrial history. In 1943, Argentina was a pioneer, becoming the first country in Latin America to design and mass-produce a medium tank: the Nahuel DL-43.
The shift from being a regional leader to depending on Elbit Systems for the TAM 2C modernization highlights a dramatic "de-industrialization" cycle.
* Argentina's reliance on Israel to modernize the TAM (Tanque Argentino Mediano) is a significant historical irony. Argentina began manufacturing its first indigenous tank, the Nahuel DL-43, in 1943. This occurred five years before the State of Israel was established in 1948.
The shift from being a regional leader to depending on Elbit Systems for the TAM 2C modernization highlights a dramatic "de-industrialization" cycle.
* Argentina's reliance on Israel to modernize the TAM (Tanque Argentino Mediano) is a significant historical irony. Argentina began manufacturing its first indigenous tank, the Nahuel DL-43, in 1943. This occurred five years before the State of Israel was established in 1948.
Some local projects in the manufacture of armored vehicles.
1940s - There were experimental Argentine military vehicles in the early 1940s named after local fauna, including the
Vinchuca. During World War II, Argentina faced a severe shortage of modern military equipment due to its neutrality and the subsequent US arms embargo. This led to a series of indigenous projects led by engineers like Colonel Alfredo Bisi (who also designed the Nahuel D.L. 43 tank) to create local armored and transport solutions.
The Vinchuca (named after the "kissing bug" letal insect common in the region) was part of a small family of vehicles designed between 1943 and 1945:
Vinchuca (Heavy Transport): The Vinchuca was a prototype for a heavy armored transport or truck designed to provide mobility for troops and equipment. Information on it is rarer than its siblings, as it remained largely in the experimental or limited prototype phase.
Yacaré (Artillery Tractor): Often mentioned alongside the Vinchuca, the Yacaré (Caiman) was an armored tracked artillery tractor built in 1944. It used a modified chassis and was intended to tow the heavy artillery pieces, such as the 105mm Schneider.
Nahuel (Medium Tank): The most famous of the group, this 35-ton tank was armed with the 75mm Krupp M1909 gun you noted earlier.
These projects, while technically successful, were mostly abandoned by 1946 when Argentina was finally able to purchase massive amounts of surplus Allied equipment, such as Sherman tanks and M3 Half-tracks, at a fraction of the cost of local production.
1960s - The VCI Alvarez Condarco (Vehículo de Combate de Infantería), an ambitious domestic project from the late 1960s intended to modernize the Argentine Army's mechanized forces.
In the 1960s, Argentina sought to reduce its dependence on foreign arms imports. The Alvarez Condarco (named after the engineer of the Army of the Andes) was designed as a local alternative to the American M113 Armored Personnel Carrier.
Design Influence: While it shared the "boxy" silhouette and general role of the M113, its design was actually closer to European infantry fighting vehicles of the era.
Technical Specs: It was a tracked vehicle featuring a 20mm or 30mm autocannon in a small turret, giving it significantly more firepower than the standard machine-gun-armed M113.
Outcome of the Project
Prototypes: At least one prototype was built by the Astilleros y Fábricas Navales del Estado (AFNE). It was tested extensively by the Argentine Army during the late 60s and early 70s.
Cancellation: The project was eventually sidelined in favor of purchasing the French AMX-VCI and later the mass acquisition of surplus American M113s.
The lessons learned from the Alvarez Condarco contributed to the domestic expertise that eventually led to the development of the TAM (Tanque Argentino Mediano) family in the 1970s, specifically the VCTP infantry fighting vehicle.
1940s - There were experimental Argentine military vehicles in the early 1940s named after local fauna, including the
Vinchuca. During World War II, Argentina faced a severe shortage of modern military equipment due to its neutrality and the subsequent US arms embargo. This led to a series of indigenous projects led by engineers like Colonel Alfredo Bisi (who also designed the Nahuel D.L. 43 tank) to create local armored and transport solutions.
The Vinchuca (named after the "kissing bug" letal insect common in the region) was part of a small family of vehicles designed between 1943 and 1945:
Vinchuca (Heavy Transport): The Vinchuca was a prototype for a heavy armored transport or truck designed to provide mobility for troops and equipment. Information on it is rarer than its siblings, as it remained largely in the experimental or limited prototype phase.
Yacaré (Artillery Tractor): Often mentioned alongside the Vinchuca, the Yacaré (Caiman) was an armored tracked artillery tractor built in 1944. It used a modified chassis and was intended to tow the heavy artillery pieces, such as the 105mm Schneider.
Nahuel (Medium Tank): The most famous of the group, this 35-ton tank was armed with the 75mm Krupp M1909 gun you noted earlier.
These projects, while technically successful, were mostly abandoned by 1946 when Argentina was finally able to purchase massive amounts of surplus Allied equipment, such as Sherman tanks and M3 Half-tracks, at a fraction of the cost of local production.
1960s - The VCI Alvarez Condarco (Vehículo de Combate de Infantería), an ambitious domestic project from the late 1960s intended to modernize the Argentine Army's mechanized forces.
In the 1960s, Argentina sought to reduce its dependence on foreign arms imports. The Alvarez Condarco (named after the engineer of the Army of the Andes) was designed as a local alternative to the American M113 Armored Personnel Carrier.
Design Influence: While it shared the "boxy" silhouette and general role of the M113, its design was actually closer to European infantry fighting vehicles of the era.
Technical Specs: It was a tracked vehicle featuring a 20mm or 30mm autocannon in a small turret, giving it significantly more firepower than the standard machine-gun-armed M113.
Outcome of the Project
Prototypes: At least one prototype was built by the Astilleros y Fábricas Navales del Estado (AFNE). It was tested extensively by the Argentine Army during the late 60s and early 70s.
Cancellation: The project was eventually sidelined in favor of purchasing the French AMX-VCI and later the mass acquisition of surplus American M113s.
The lessons learned from the Alvarez Condarco contributed to the domestic expertise that eventually led to the development of the TAM (Tanque Argentino Mediano) family in the 1970s, specifically the VCTP infantry fighting vehicle.
